Can Donald Trump fire Fed chief Jerome Powell? – Times of India


Can Trump legally fire Powell?

Donald Trumpappointed Jerome Powell as the Fed chief in 2017 and his term will end in May 2026. This is not the first time that Trump has threatened to fire Powell as he clashed with Powell in 2018 as well over interest rate policies but he was not fired.On Wednesday night, Trump raged against Powell and said his termination cannot come fast enough.
Calling Powell “too late and wrong”, Trump said he should lower the interest rates now, though it is too late.
Earlier on Wednesday, Powell said the level of the tariff increases announced so far is significantly larger than anticipated and it will cause “higher inflation and slower growth.” US stocks tumbled as Powell spoke. Powell said there was no immediate need to cut interest rates.
Trump’s post came shortly before the European Central Bank cut interest rates for the seventh time in eight meetings to soften the impact of Trump’s trade war. The ECB said the outlook for growth has “deteriorated owing to rising trade tensions.”

But can Trump fire Powell?

According to Marketwatch.com, the market doesn’t expect Powell to be fired. On the prediction market Polymarket, the odds that Trump will remove Powell this year rose as high as 19 cents on the dollar, up slightly from 16 cents.
On several occasions, Powell said that it is not permitted under the law for the president to fire him.
The Federal Reserve Act states that members of the Federal Reserve Board, including the chairman, can be removed by the president “for cause,” which courts have interpreted as misconduct, inefficiency, or malfeasance—not mere policy disagreements or personal dislike. There is no explicit statute clarifying whether a president can remove the Fed chair specifically, and no president has ever attempted to do so.
Attempting to fire Powell would likely trigger significant market volatility, as seen in 2018 when stocks plummeted amid rumors of Powell’s removal. Legally, Trump’s ability to fire Powell is highly constrained, requiring a “for cause” justification that would likely fail in court unless Powell committed clear misconduct.





Source link

support@headlinenews360.com

Related Posts

‘Remove possession from POK’, Pakistan was shocked by India’s statement, said- this is the international controversy …

Pakistan on the issue of Jammu and Kashmir: Pakistan has expressed displeasure over the statement of India, which said that Pakistan should vacate PoK (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir). On Friday, Pakistan’s…

‘We are ahead of India in case of defense, Pakistani man made strange claim

Pakistan Public Reaction On India: Bangladesh has appealed to Pakistan to apologize for 1971. Pakistani YouTuber Shoaib Chaudhary spoke to Awam on this issue. He questioned the public whether Pakistan…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *